Searched hist:"4951967 d" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /qemu/include/qemu/ |
| H A D | ratelimit.h | 4951967d Tue Apr 13 08:20:32 GMT 2021 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> ratelimit: protect with a mutex
Right now, rate limiting is protected by the AioContext mutex, which is
taken for example both by the block jobs and by qmp_block_job_set_speed
(via find_block_job).
We would like to remove the dependency of block layer code on the
AioContext mutex, since most drivers and the core I/O code are already
not relying on it. However, there is no existing lock that can easily
be taken by both ratelimit_set_speed and ratelimit_calculate_delay,
especially because the latter might run in coroutine context (and
therefore under a CoMutex) but the former will not.
Since concurrent calls to ratelimit_calculate_delay are not possible,
one idea could be to use a seqlock to get a snapshot of slice_ns and
slice_quota. But for now keep it simple, and just add a mutex to the
RateLimit struct; block jobs are generally not performance critical to
the point of optimizing the clock cycles spent in synchronization.
This also requires the introduction of init/destroy functions, so
add them to the two users of ratelimit.h.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| /qemu/block/ |
| H A D | block-copy.c | 4951967d Tue Apr 13 08:20:32 GMT 2021 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> ratelimit: protect with a mutex
Right now, rate limiting is protected by the AioContext mutex, which is
taken for example both by the block jobs and by qmp_block_job_set_speed
(via find_block_job).
We would like to remove the dependency of block layer code on the
AioContext mutex, since most drivers and the core I/O code are already
not relying on it. However, there is no existing lock that can easily
be taken by both ratelimit_set_speed and ratelimit_calculate_delay,
especially because the latter might run in coroutine context (and
therefore under a CoMutex) but the former will not.
Since concurrent calls to ratelimit_calculate_delay are not possible,
one idea could be to use a seqlock to get a snapshot of slice_ns and
slice_quota. But for now keep it simple, and just add a mutex to the
RateLimit struct; block jobs are generally not performance critical to
the point of optimizing the clock cycles spent in synchronization.
This also requires the introduction of init/destroy functions, so
add them to the two users of ratelimit.h.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| /qemu/ |
| H A D | blockjob.c | 4951967d Tue Apr 13 08:20:32 GMT 2021 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> ratelimit: protect with a mutex
Right now, rate limiting is protected by the AioContext mutex, which is
taken for example both by the block jobs and by qmp_block_job_set_speed
(via find_block_job).
We would like to remove the dependency of block layer code on the
AioContext mutex, since most drivers and the core I/O code are already
not relying on it. However, there is no existing lock that can easily
be taken by both ratelimit_set_speed and ratelimit_calculate_delay,
especially because the latter might run in coroutine context (and
therefore under a CoMutex) but the former will not.
Since concurrent calls to ratelimit_calculate_delay are not possible,
one idea could be to use a seqlock to get a snapshot of slice_ns and
slice_quota. But for now keep it simple, and just add a mutex to the
RateLimit struct; block jobs are generally not performance critical to
the point of optimizing the clock cycles spent in synchronization.
This also requires the introduction of init/destroy functions, so
add them to the two users of ratelimit.h.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|